Fig. 7.4 Loeffler’s syndrome (acute eosinophilic pneumonia). Bilateral patchy consolidations in the lung periphery parallel to the lateral chest wall are characteristic (“reversed pulmonary edema pattern”). The more central appearing infiltrates are anatomically located in the anterior or posterior lung periphery.
Fig. 7.5 Aspiration. A unilateral pulmonary edema pattern with air bronchograms is seen in the right lung. The aspiration occurred with the patient lying on his right side.
Fig. 7.6 Narcotic abuse (cocaine). Pulmonary edema is present bilaterally, but much more severe on the right side.
The “reversed pulmonary edema pattern” represents virtually a photographic negative of the “bat’s wing” or “butterfly” pattern and is characterized by homogeneous consolidations in the lung periphery running more or less parallel to the lateral chest wall. This pattern is commonly found in acute (Loeffler’s syndrome) and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (Fig. 7.4).
An edema pattern caused by pulmonary hemorrhage frequently appears somewhat more dense than usual, although this finding largely depends on the employed radiographic technique. It may be observed with lung contusion, bleeding or clotting disorders, idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis, Goodpasture syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus and chronic renal failure.
Unilateral pulmonary edema (Fig. 7.5 and 22.6) can be divided into ipsilateral and contralateral types. The former refers to conditions in which the pathogenetic mechanism leading to the asymmetry is on the side of the edema and include prolonged lateral decubitus position in cardiac decompensation, unilateral aspiration, pulmonary contusion, rapid thoracentesis, and unilateral bronchial or pulmonary venous obstruction. Contralateral pulmonary edema refers to accumulation of excess water in the normal lung opposite the diseased lung. The most common cause is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but it is also associated with acute pulmonary thromboembolism, Swyer–James syndrome, and unilateral lung destruction, fibrosis and pleural disease.
Disease
Radiographic Findings
Comments
Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (alveolar cell carcinoma) (Fig. 7.7)
Alveolar infiltrates combined with reticulonodular and linear densities.
Pleural effusions in approximately 10%. Hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement uncommon.
Lymphangitic carcinomatosis (Fig. 7.8)
Interstitial and alveolar infiltrates similar to cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but with severe loss of lung volume and without cardiomegaly. Pleural effusions are commonly associated.
This represents an advanced stage of the disease that is virtually always associated with severe dyspnea.
Lymphoma and leukemia (Fig. 7.9)
Bilateral interstitial and alveolar infiltrates involving preferentially the perihilar areas and lower-lung fields. Appearance of symmetrical lung involvement may vary from predominantly interstitial edema to homogeneous consolidations.
In a lymphoma or leukemia patient these findings are, however, more often caused by intervening pneumonias, drug reaction, or hemorrhages, rather than by the underlying malignancy itself.
Kaposi’s sarcoma (Fig. 7.10)
Numerous poorly defined metastases may mimic extensive bilateral infiltrates (opportunistic infections).
Common in male homosexual AIDS patients.
Pneumonia, bacterial (e.g., staphylococcus, Gram-negative bacteria, anaerobics, and tuberculosis) (Fig. 7.11)
Patchy confluent infiltrates often associated with areas of homogeneous consolidations. Cavitary lesions are relatively common and their demonstration is useful for the differentiation from other conditions presenting with a pulmonary edema pattern.
Bronchogenic spread by inhalation (e.g., staphylococcus), aspiration (e.g., anaerobic bacteria) or communication between abscess or cavity and bronchial system (e.g., tuberculosis).
Pneunomia, fungal (e.g., histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, blastomycosis, aspergillosis, candidiasis)
Bilateral confluent infiltrates similar to aforementioned bacterial pneumonias, but cavitation less common. Hilar lymph node enlargement occurs only rarely, but when present, might be useful for differential diagnosis from nonfungal pneumonias.
This form is virtually limited to compromised hosts. An overwhelming exposure to the fungus rarely may produce this radiographic appearance in histoplasmosis.
Pneumonia, mycoplasma and viral (influenza, parainfluenza, coxsackie, adenovirus, psittacosis, varicella, SARS) (Fig. 7.12)
Diffuse reticular pattern with superimposed patchy alveolar infiltrates. Cavitation does not occur and hilar lymph node enlargement is extremely rare in the adult.
SARS (severe acute respilatory distress syndrome) presenting with a pulmonary edema pattern (15%) is associated with the highest mortality rate.
Rickettsial infections (e.g. Q-fever and Rocky Mountain spotted fever) may occasionally mimic viral pneumonias.
Cytomegalovirus (cytomegalic inclusion disease, CID) (Fig. 7.13)
Diffuse reticulonodular and alveolar infiltrates, preferentially involving the periphery of the middle and lower lobes.
In compromised hosts (e.g., renal transplants).
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue
You may also need an Radiology appGet it now
- Mediastinal or Hilar Enlargement
- Alveolar Infiltrates and Atelectasis
- Hyperlucent Lung
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- Pulmonary Nodules and Mass Lesions
- Pleura and Diaphragm
- Intrathoracic Calcifications
- Pulmonary Cavitary and Cystic Lesions
Tags: The Chest X-Ray
Aug 27, 2016 | Posted by admin in NUCLEAR MEDICINE | Comments Off on Pulmonary Edema and Symmetrical Bilateral Infiltrates
Premium Wordpress Themes by UFO ThemesWordPress theme by UFO themes
